madameblogalot

I was thinking of the saying that “all press is good press” and wondering if it is true. I came across a situation in which I was advised not to blog about it because even the “bad press” of a negative blog post (or several from many disgruntled bloggers) would only serve to help the entity being blogged about. I wondered about that. Especially in light of all the “bad press” I have been giving to Comcast in my other blog. It is the only way I know to spread the word about the poor service we have received and also served as a great way for me to “vent” about it. As I was thinking about the “all press is good press” I came across an article on the stage two blog which supports the idea that bad press is bad press-at least for the middle size companies. So in dealing with a large corporation, is it worth it to give “bad press”? Or does it really only serve to keep their name “out there” with most folks blowing off a particular case and only remembering the big name?